🔗 Share this article

Ex-President Donald Trump has repeatedly expressed his desire to see critics investigated, exerting influence on the Justice Department to charge former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

"We can't delay any longer, it's damaging our standing and credibility," the president stated recently in a social media post.

"I was impeached twice, and charged me (five times!)" he declared, mentioning the multiple legal proceedings he faced after departing the White House in 2021 and James's lawsuit.

Both have subsequently been indicted, in situations that many experts have said seem to be politically motivated and difficult to succeed in court.

But the most recent allegations against a Trump critic, former national security adviser John Bolton, stand apart, legal specialists and former prosecutors say.

"In my opinion, contrasting Bolton's charges to Comey's is like comparing two different things," stated Mark Lesko, a former acting US attorney for the Eastern District of New York.

This Details of the Legal Situation

Bolton has been criminally indicted on federal charges pertaining to the alleged improper handling of sensitive materials. Since leaving the White House in 2019, he has emerged as a outspoken Trump critic, going so far as to describe him "remarkably ignorant" and unsuitable for office in his book.

Experts contend that while there may be political motivations to target Bolton, the procedures used to obtain an charge and the evidence compiled against him suggest a possibly stronger case than the DOJ presented against Comey.

"This misconduct that's being claimed is both more serious and seems to have occurred over a significant duration," said Carissa Byrne Hessick, a academic at the University of North Carolina School of Law.

Throughout his tenure as Trump's national security adviser, and following his 2019 White House exit, prosecutors alleged that Bolton put the country at danger by wrongfully retaining and transmitting classified information to family members using insecure means, including AOL. Several of the materials were marked top secret.

The indictment alleges that at a certain time a unauthorized user accessed to Bolton's account where files were kept and sent an seeming warning to cause "the largest scandal since Hillary [Clinton]'s emails were leaked".

Bolton entered a not guilty plea during a hearing on Friday to eighteen distinct charges of improperly handling sensitive materials.

Retribution or a Substantial Case?

The timing of his charge - arriving on the heels of charges against Comey - has renewed questions about political pressure on the legal system.

Trump once implied Bolton should be in jail, and called him a "disreputable person". Bolton, for his role, wrote a publication about his experience in the Trump government that was sharply negative of the president.

"There's no question that the schedule of this indictment, when paired with others, has raised doubts about the validity of these charges, and why these counts are being brought at this time," stated Jamil Jaffer, creator and executive director of the National Security Institute.

However, he continued, "if the Justice Department is capable to prove the facts stated and show the information is properly designated, his conduct may very well have broken the law".

Prosecuting such a senior official for improperly handling classified documents is "rare" but not unprecedented, said Carrie Cordero, a expert at the Center for a New American Security.

"Cases that concern sensitive materials present challenges to try, but they can and are filed against both low-level and high-level officials, from time to time," she explained.

Similarities to Examinations into Former President and President

Trump similarly faced allegations of improperly keeping classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago property in Florida and obstructing their return, but that matter was ultimately thrown out by a federal judge and voided by his return as leader.

A special counsel additionally found that ex-President Joe Biden improperly maintained sensitive materials from his time as vice president, but did not prosecute him.

Bolton's case shares characteristics to Biden's sensitive materials issues, said Mr Lesko, who also held a senior national security position at the Justice Department.

Rigorous procedures regulate the management of sensitive materials. To secure a guilty verdict, the prosecution must prove that Bolton was aware the information he was transmitting was restricted, and he had to knowingly transfer it to someone not entitled to obtain it.

"Because of the classified character of the information at question in this matter, we lack a great deal of particulars about the reasons the prosecution believes things like the diary entries and the additional information he communicated by electronic message, and the reason there were classified," explained Mr Jaffer.

A Increasingly Traditional Prosecution

The process by which the DOJ brought this case will be closely examined, following Trump openly posted his desire to see his political opponents charged and some of those indictments materialized.

But Mr Lesko indicated in Bolton's case, prosecutors seem to have followed protocol.

"This Bolton prosecution and eventually the indictment appeared to have followed the regular procedure including the regulations and standards within the Department of Justice," he said.

Unlike Comey's brief, two-page charge, Bolton's was a increasingly "conventional" filing that "clearly sets forth the particulars concerning the facts and situation here," Mr Lesko commented.

"It appears fairly aligned with a long line of precedents... where public servants mishandled and transmitted sensitive information."