🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours before the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange issued a bold forecast – not just the winner citywide, and precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst who grew up in New York City, devoted over a decade in left-leaning activism and has become something of a local celebrity this year for his deep dives into municipal statistics and polling.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani would win while failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, running from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he predicted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would win by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, certain media outlets and financial newspapers outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and the majority of electors leaned toward the independent, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Patterns and Unexpected Results

What was your night?

I had to do that since they were dropping around 200,000 votes into the tally frequently! I felt somewhat anxious at the beginning: The candidate led the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were two big batches of votes added after that and his lead dropped from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, it was possible in which election day turned out somewhat badly for Mamdani, where Cuomo was going to end up essentially increasing his support from the earlier contest. However Mamdani added half a million votes to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He campaigned and greatly broadened his support from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did Mamdani get additional support from?

He assembled the coalition that the left always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and individuals squeezed by affordability. He improved significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the primary. Plus he boosted his base of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He created the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse, youthful, tenants and residents struggling with costs

Additionally, there were some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, limited to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Electors in ethnic enclaves that went for the former president last year backed Zohran now. However it’s not that he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Effects

One of the big stories of the night was the record participation. Who benefited?

Both sides. Turnout was much greater than anticipated. I thought it could exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – that is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Currently you would say he’s favored to surpass half. He’s at 50.4% but there’s still probably 200,000 votes left to report at that time. Thus it’s not certain, but I think probable, and I wish he achieves it because then none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His support completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Including one neighborhood in the borough, similar to an highly conservative area. That truly was unexpected. The independent kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and then added many conservatives on the island who had a strong turnout. I think occurred significant tactical voting by the Republicans. This happened before the former president endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome unless the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your often-discussed “commie corridor” – was support for the candidate dominant in those parts of the boroughs?

In my view there was a little dilution of the progressive zone in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. There, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners supported the independent. So there was a little resistance. But overall, largely the leftist base is another huge reason why Mamdani won – he was polling between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote we reported on whether the candidate was gaining ground with the community. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

Exist neighborhoods with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – like specific locales – where he did well. But in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his position on Israel definitely mattered in those places. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they favored Cuomo. And also, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were pretty staunchly Cuomo. So it’s unclear if existed major surprises on this one, but he retained left-leaning areas and even parts of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest figures from the left hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that there will be additional examples – candidates will come from these areas to be elevated nationally.

But I think that every city in America can have similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of leftwing power in the nation – because youth reside there, people rent and they are places where people are crushed by the disparities we face.